Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

MRBEST mempubikasikan artikel dengan tema yang terkait dengan bidang bisnis, ekonomi, sains, dan terapan, meliputi namun tidak terbatas pada:

  1. Manajemen
  2. Akuntansi
  3. Bisnis 
  4. Ekonomi
  5. Ekonomi Islam

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Artikel yang dikirim akan dievaluasi melalui 2 tahap review, yaitu pre-review dan review substansi. Review dilakukan untuk meninjau kesesuaian artikel dengan fokus dan ruang lingkup jurnal serta pedoman penulisan. Selanjutnya, akan diakukan pemeriksaan plagiarisme untuk artikel yang akan diterbitkan.

Penilaian naskah yang akan diterbitkan berdasarkan pertimbangan sebagai berikut:

  1. Keaslian naskah
  2. Kontribusi terhadap pengembangan keilmuan
  3. Kesesuaian topik dengan scope Jurnal MRBEST

Keputusan apakah artikel dapat diterbitkan adalah otoritas dari Editor, dengan mempertimbangkan rekomendasi dari reviewer.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Journal Ethic Statement

Duties of Authors
  1. Reporting Standards:
    Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
  2. Data Access and Retention:
    Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
  3. Originality and Plagiarism: The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
  4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication:
    An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
  5. Acknowledgement of Sources:
    Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
  6. Authorship of the Paper:
    Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
  7. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest:
    All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
  8. Fundamental errors in published works:
    When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
  9. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects:
    If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.


Duties of Editors

  1. Fair Play:
    An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
  2. Confidentiality:
    The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
  3. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest:
    Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
  4. Publication Decisions:
    The editor board journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
  5. Review of Manuscripts:
    The editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organise and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. The editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.


Duties of Reviewers

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions:
    Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
  2. Promptness:
    Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process
  3. Standards of Objectivity:
    Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  4. Confidentiality:
    Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.
  5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:
    Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
  6. Acknowledgement of Sources:
    Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

 

Open Access Statement

"Media Riset Bisnis Ekonomi Sains dan Terapan" (MRBEST) Journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public to supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Media Riset Bisnis Ekonomi Sains dan Terapan © 2023 by Taksasila Edukasi Insani is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Creative Commons BY-SA

 

Generative AI Policy

Media Riset Pendidikan Kesenian Agama dan Olahraga (MRPENDEKAR) recognizes that generative artificial intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted technologies may support academic writing when used responsibly, transparently, and under full human oversight. This policy applies to all authors, reviewers, editors, and editorial staff involved in the submission, review, editing, and publication process of JIIF.

1. Use of Generative AI by Authors

Authors may use generative AI or AI-assisted tools only to improve the readability, grammar, language quality, translation support, formatting, or technical clarity of the manuscript. Such tools must not be used to replace the author's scholarly judgment, critical analysis, interpretation of data, argument development, or responsibility for the accuracy and originality of the work.

Authors remain fully responsible and accountable for all content submitted to JIIF, including the accuracy of facts, citations, quotations, data, interpretations, references, and conclusions. AI-generated text must be carefully reviewed, edited, verified, and approved by the authors before submission.

2. Disclosure Requirement

Any use of generative AI or AI-assisted tools in preparing the manuscript must be disclosed clearly in the manuscript. The disclosure statement must be placed before the reference list under the following heading:

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies in the Writing Process

Authors may use the following format:

During the preparation of this manuscript, the author(s) used [name of tool/service] for [purpose, e.g., language editing, grammar checking, translation assistance, or improving readability]. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed, edited, and verified the content as needed and take full responsibility for the final content of the manuscript.

If no generative AI or AI-assisted technology was used, authors may state:

The author(s) declare that no generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were used in the writing process of this manuscript.

3. Prohibition of AI Authorship

Generative AI tools, chatbots, large language models, or other AI systems cannot be listed as authors or co-authors. Authorship is limited to human individuals who have made substantial scholarly contributions to the conception, design, execution, analysis, interpretation, writing, or revision of the manuscript and who can take responsibility for the published work.

4. Accuracy, Citations, and Research Integrity

Authors must not rely on generative AI to create, fabricate, or verify references, quotations, data, legal texts, religious texts, hadith, Qur'anic interpretation, historical claims, field findings, or other scholarly evidence. All references, quotations, translations, and data must be checked against reliable and traceable sources.

The use of AI-generated or AI-assisted content that results in fabricated references, inaccurate quotations, false data, plagiarism, misleading claims, or unsupported arguments may be considered a breach of publication ethics and may lead to rejection, correction, retraction, or other editorial action.

5. Use of AI-Generated Images, Tables, and Figures

Authors must not submit images, figures, tables, diagrams, or visual materials generated or substantially altered by AI unless such use is scientifically justified, clearly disclosed, and permitted by copyright, licensing, and research ethics standards. Any AI-assisted visual material must be labeled transparently, and authors must be able to explain how it was produced and verified.

6. Use of AI in Data Analysis

If AI-assisted tools are used as part of the research process, including data processing, coding, translation of interview materials, text mining, classification, statistical support, or qualitative analysis, authors must describe this use in the Methods section. The description should include the tool used, the purpose of use, the level of human supervision, and the steps taken to verify the results.

7. Confidentiality in Peer Review and Editorial Process

Reviewers, editors, and editorial staff must treat submitted manuscripts as confidential documents. They must not upload manuscripts, reviewer comments, unpublished data, or any part of the submission to public or external generative AI tools, because this may violate confidentiality, authors' rights, data protection, and publication ethics.

Generative AI tools must not be used by reviewers or editors to replace their own critical judgment, scholarly evaluation, recommendation, or editorial decision. Reviewers and editors remain fully responsible for the content of their reviews, recommendations, and decisions.

8. Editorial Screening and Sanctions

JIIF reserves the right to request clarification from authors regarding the use of generative AI or AI-assisted technologies. The editorial team may reject a manuscript, request revision, issue a correction, or take further publication ethics action if undisclosed or inappropriate AI use is identified.

Failure to disclose the use of generative AI, listing AI as an author, submitting AI-fabricated references or data, or using AI in a way that compromises originality, confidentiality, or research integrity may be treated as a violation of JIIF's publication ethics policy.

9. Policy Updates

This policy may be updated periodically in response to developments in publication ethics, indexing standards, publisher policies, and international best practices regarding the responsible use of generative AI in scholarly publishing.

 

We prioritize research

We prioritize research that contributes to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) program. We hope this journal can be a source of new insights and inspiration for further research. 

 

 

OJS Editorial and Publishing Process